I see this ongoing ridiculous word-parsing in an attempt to delegitimize the Romneys as “like us” (whoever the proverbial “us” are) continues here unabated.  Gotta “love” that the Liberal talking points have made it to thejanedough.  

Honestly; fair-minded, reasonable people would recognize that without creating yet another faux issue.
This is pathetic, and I “love” pointing that out to you and everyone else engaging in this absurd exercise.  All she’s saying is that it’s not a cookie-cutter world and that everyone’s circumstances are different, and that we should value whatever choices are made.

How can anyone who has the money to trade in purebred competition horses, his and her competition horses, that’s more than one horse per spouse, possibly understand what it’s like to have to make tough financial decisions?

well i’m votin for Obama

She obviously caught foot-in-mouth disease from her hubby.

 rather have foot in mouth then dog in  mouth

we must all pray for BO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_q9ns8LVVs&feature=related

This feels like an answer to some of the Hilary Rosen defenders who said that the political consultant made a valid

http://disabilityinsuranceillinois.com/
 

This woman has hobo shit for brains.

 You can certainly characterize it as word parsing, but I don’t. This is a protracted job interview we’re having right now and everything about a candidate is worth taking a look at.

You are translating for us what you think Ann Romney meant. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could understand what she meant without a translation? But in this case we do need clarification because what she said seems outrageous. It’s along the same lines as her husband saying he likes to fire people. I know that was in the context of people who did a poor job for him, but still. To “like” what is universally considered an unpleasant experience, is odd. As odd as what Ann Romney said about loving the fact that some women with small children have no choice but to work outside the home.

When too much translation is needed that means too much confusion resulted initially. I have to wonder about that.

You make a snarky comment at the end of your post. Do you have an example of a prominent politician saying something controversial that wasn’t analyzed and gossiped about by pundits, bloggers and others?

as Terry answered I cant believe that a person able to make $9844 in 4 weeks on the computer. did you read this page… http://makeadesire.blogspot.in/

Your comment is about the extent of any eloquence I have come to expect from today’s Republican party.

In the absence of ANY successful accomplishments from the past to brag about and NOTHING for the future other than the same GOP plans that have demonstrated themselves to be proven failures, all you people are left with is the strange habit of posting useless comments that have some reference to ‘poopie’.

Keep up the good work. Every time one of you people makes a post, Obama gets another vote.