1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Esquire Writer Complains ‘Feminine Contempt Is Everywhere’ — Is It, Though?


Yesterday Esquire published a story by Stephen Marche titled “The Contempt of Women” with the subtitle “The rise of men. And the whining of girls.” Really — I’m not making that up.

What is there to say about this piece? For starters, for a story mocking “girls” for their “whining,” it comes across as kinda whiny. It points to ’90s relic Homer Simpson as a recent example of male buffoonery in popular culture. It implies that rape comedian Daniel Tosh perhaps suffers from a crisis of confidence. It suggests that all “ordinary women” have a contempt for men. It provides a single, one-sentence quotation from Christine Lagarde as evidence that all female political leaders lack compassion. This is a long-form way of saying “The Contempt of Women” inspires so many headdesky moments, you’d better come to it equipped with an armful of Advil. The piece reads, at times, as though Marche has fallen into a Lebowskian-scissor-dream delusion.

But for all its shortcomings (its accusation that Michelle Obama regularly, gleefully emasculates her husband chief among them), “The Contempt of Women” gets a handful of things right. And we shouldn’t completely dismiss it.

As Marche points out, the so-called “masculinity crisis” that’s unfolded lately is really a “crisis for idiots.” It’s a crisis for people who buy into the Brawny Man approach to masculinity. And we can see this insecure manhood proliferate in every aspect of American mass culture. It’s in the pages of the New York Times; it’s in our T.V. shows — and in our beer commercials:

GASP — a purse???

This pattern is what I like to call the “Are You Sure You’re A Dude?” phenomenon. It’s coded messages telling us over and over that you define your masculinity in the beer you drink, the clothes you wear and, yep, how you treat women. And it should come as no surprise that the guys who pass this “test,” the ones who are most macho, are often the most sexist ones of all. This hurts everyone — including the guys who feel like they have to buy their own trained masculinity.

And it’s the (hopefully impending) decimation of this macho culture — the real war on guys — that signals Marche’s “rise of men”:

There are always going to be stupid men in the world, but the ignorant and insensitive, the uninterested and uncaring, will have no place in it. I suppose I should feel compassion, or some kind of weird gender loyalty, for the guys who can’t figure this out. In all honesty, I don’t. There is no masculinity crisis.

There’s a crisis for idiots. The Tucker Maxes of the world are doomed. That’s not the end of men. It’s the beginning.

He’s right. The end of “ignorant and insensitive” masculinity may be among the best things to happen to men — and women. There’s a lot of hyper-masculine culture about which women are rightfully ticked.

Marche’s argument goes off the rails, however, when he addresses women’s place in this cultural shift. “Contempt for men has become so widespread and acceptable that it’s a commonplace for politicians’ wives,” Marche notes, perhaps referring to the soon-to-be-former Mrs. Strauss-Kahn? (I kid.) Marche seems incapable of recognizing the difference between criticizing male performance and criticizing the men. And it’s in that failure of recognition that Marche (either purposefully or inadvertently) reinforces some of the worst stereotypes about feminism.

As Shakesville put it in its fantastic response piece:

There’s a lot wrong with this article, starting with the basic problem that Marche cannot (or will not) distinguish between contempt for men and contempt for expressions of patriarchy-compliant masculinity… privileged people who don’t want to be held accountable for their behavior like to accuse the marginalized people contemptuous of that behavior of being, instead, contemptuous of their personhood.

We don’t have a “contempt for men” — we have a contempt for assholery. And Marche’s inability to make that distinction only proves he’s part of the problem.

TAGS:

  • Anonymous

    “We don’t have a “contempt for men” — we have a contempt for assholery. ”

    Why are there so many people with tales of being “nice guys” and treated like pariahs by women and then changing over to  “assholery” and getting all the women they want?  Men aren’t what is causing this.

  • Anonymous

    If it was so easy for them to “change over” to assholery perhaps they weren’t really “nice guys” to begin with.

  • http://twitter.com/LauraDonovanUA Laura Donovan

    Agreed. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/F6WDMXYFH6S5NTOYGNP6WPXGFA Sarah

     There are guys who are nice and then there are Nice Guys. The ones who think they are entitled to sex because they were nice to a woman.

  • http://www.youtube.com/cherubicwindigo Laura

    All of the actually nice people I know, both male and female, are all already in relationships. They aren’t looking to “get all the women they want”. The guys I know who sleep with a lot of women are all sleeping with the same cross-section women. Those women like to sleep around just as much as their male counterparts and don’t care if a guy is nice or not, they just want to get laid. Like a normal person. Men and women are the same, pretending they aren’t is a waste of time.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve thought the same thing but there is definitely something to this.  And nice guys are treated like crap.

    http://articles.cnn.com/2010-04-14/living/mr.nice.guy.backlash_1_mr-nice-guy-nice-guy-persona-bad-boys?_s=PM:LIVING

  • Adam R. Charpentier

    If I could poison all of the men that complain about being nice guys and thus finish last, I’d do it. If you’re such a goddamn nice guy, then what were you looking for? Recognition? Sex?

    Know what? Gandi seems like a nice guy (or so I’ve heard) but he also drank his own pee (they said so on TV) and was assassinated, so there you go. Go drink your pee and we’ll talk.

  • Adam R. Charpentier

    So much truth.

  • Lindsay Cross

    That was the perfect response to that nonsense and I may have to steal it from you in the future.

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities

© 2013 The Jane Dough | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Contact | Archives | Send a Tip | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram

X