1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Julianna Margulies: Wives Of Philandering Politicos “Gullible” For Supporting Them


Actress Julianna Margulies spoke out on the issue of political cuckoldry in the latest edition of More magazine. And while her intentions were noble, the message was anything but kind.

As the star of “The Good Wife,” Margulies was, predictably, asked about wives whose politician husbands wind up embroiled in high-profile sex scandals. Specifically, the magazine asked her about watching wives like Silda Spitzer and Dina Matos (former wife of New Jersey Governor James McGreevey) stand next to their husbands at quote unquote those press conferences, according to the New York Post:

“I remember thinking, ‘Get off the stage!’ I couldn’t believe the women were gullible enough to get up there, and I couldn’t believe that the men could be such a–holes to ask.”

A–holes to ask? Yes, definitely. But “gullible?” Wait a minute.

First, the obvious question: Why are we criticizing wives who endure bitter, ugly, humiliating public scandals that can — and do, sometimes — destroy their families? There are a select group of people out there who, unless they just killed a puppy, should be granted greater consideration before public reproach. I nominate Silda Spitzer and Dina Matos to join that group.

Also, “gullible?” What about the fact that these women have kids? Or that they’re trying to hold it together, be brave in public, and all that? Are we to think they’re too stupid to realize they have choices?

Of course, we’ve heard this before. This brings us back to the frequent criticisms against Hillary Clinton — the idea is that these women are somehow culpable in their husbands’ philandering because they didn’t stick it to ‘em in public. If only they’d been stronger, less “gullible” they’d put an end to this, is the message. Since when is it these women’s job to inform people whether or not they’re cool with cheating?

“Oh, so wait, you didn’t want me to cheat? I had no idea! Thanks for clearing that up,” said no husband, ever. And I think the rest of us are clear on their stance, too.

I appreciate what Margulies is trying to say here — stick up for yourself, don’t be a doormat, et cetera. But whether any of these women would like to prove that now (or on some other occasion) is their call.

TAGS: |

  • Anonymous

    I don’t consider Hillary Clinton guillible.  I think she just cares more about power than  marriage.  I get the feeling she couldn’t care less about her husband’s infidelity, I think it just angers her that he gets caught.  She was a willing particpant in trying to destroy the lives of the woman her husband abused.  How woman can call her a good female role model is beyond me.

  • Anonymous

    Not sure where you get:
    1. “she cares more about power than marriage.”
    2. “she couldn’t care less about her husband’s infidelity.”
    3. “it just angers her that he gets caught.”
    Regardless, you are entitled to those personal opinions.
    My personal opinion is that she has lead a life of purpose and accomplishment, and is a strong role model.

  • Christy

    Well the original poster gets those from no place at all, unless he or she knows Hilary Clinton personally.  Which is doubtful.  I’m no giant fan of Hilary Clinton, but dismissing her as gullible or conniving is a vast oversimplification.

    Why do women have to tear each other down at all?  I kind of thought that was patriarchy’s job.  And if we are going to tear each other down, which I suspect we will continue to, can we at least do it on our merits rather than how we function in relationship to men?

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities

© 2013 The Jane Dough | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Contact | Archives | Send a Tip | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram

X