The Democratic Party makes no secret that they have no place for strait employed men. Notice how the media never talks about the Democrats gender gap.

I’m a 64 yr. old, white male, USMC veteran, and I was interested in Mrs. Obamas’ speech. She sure made Mrs. Romney look wooden and stiff…just like Mitt.

Actually, that’s all in your racist, homophobic mind. My guess is that you are underemployed and are looking for someone to blame for your shortcomings.

There are millions of us straight, employed males actively supporting the Democratic Party. It’s a big tent, unlike the xenophobic, racist, sexist Republican party.

Yep, sure sounds like a big tent to me.

Who would actually take the time to measure male reaction shots? That says a lot right there. I couldn’t help but notice some less-than-friendly camera shots at the RNC by pool cameras. I could have sworn one of them was a scowling Tommy Christopher.

Well, it’s more of a “fun exercise” than a serious commentary — although the Mediaite article does feature interesting discussion about demographics!

I’m a white female. Her speech sounded like a bunch of gushing blather to me, but then, I guess it was just to rally the girly base. Sorry, I’m past.

She is a hideous, affirmative action clown. That’s why no men were interested in listening to her speak.

Read it and weep, you moron.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2012/04/10/obamas-problem-with-male-voters

My 75 year old white husband thought it was terrific and watched every minute of it.

I think we know who the clown is and I’m 74 years old and white and have never heard a women in my life give a better speech…

And I can bet you are a fat old slob, and you are calling the beautiful woman hideous. Lady Michelle Obama is no affirmative action. She is a brilliant Harvard graduate so please go away.

The real point here is how grossly misleading the headline is to this post. The headline says one thing – men not interested in FLOTUS’ speech – implies something broader – Merkin men not interested, presumably on some reliable measuring tool – and delivers a highly subjective, therefore arguable at best, completely imaginary at worst, suspect for sure, in-building camera shot listing.

What … did Sarah Devlin fail some test to get thrown off Mediaite Central, and so is not trying desperately to cobble together Drudge-like sludge to get back to The Show?

A misleading headline and a purely fabricated criticism smacks of bias and further evidence that Mediaite (in general) and Sarah Devlin (in particular) frequently shade their articles with a right-leaning bis.

I am a 72-year-old white man. Michelle Obama gave one of the best speeches i’ve ever heard in my life. She is a phenomenon, and anyone who criticizes her is almost certainly a racist.

Loved Michelle’s speech, the only one I watched beginning to end, fabulous!

That being said, and I could be wrong here, but I think Sarah’s point might have been that the media selected very few men comparatively speaking in their audience shots during the presentation.
Therefore, I take the article’s title as a facetious one, pointing out the media’s apparent belief that women were the only ones watching and interested since a woman was speaking?
I could be wrong, but this just might be an observation requiring us to think beyond our customary right/left boundaries.

You’re an asshole now stfu.

NO! NOT A BIAS!
Gee, we’ve been told this Wookie and “the best husband ever” were told a few things from a “bias” left leaning media for, what…4 1/2 years?
Fit, international style icon? No, our lying eyes tell us she is a fat arsed silly woman that dresses in too tight clothes, camel toe and xxxxxs sweaters…with the occasional fab boob belt, crooked wig hat and tranny eyebrows.
And that “best husband, etc.”… On the DL and everybody knows it.
But do keep being outraged at the bias as these two are finally vetted.

What an ugly person you are. Interior-wise, I mean.

I see Michelle still has the “sleeveless thing” going on.Lets face it, its a “look at me” thing with her. Yes, we know she has the money and the time to work out with a personal trainer, She also has 24 assistants tohelp her look the way she wants. However she does not look like a Frist Lady anywhere, either here in the US or in Europe. No First Lady dresses like her, always showing off. Its pathetic and immature.

this is a really weak “story”. In light of the fact the the First Lady has gotten rave reviews from nearly all corners, this attempted dig is not even sophomoric. Just lame.

Well….I’m not all gaga over it like the lamestreamers “best FLOTUS speech in the history of the world” according to MSNBC. It was OK, she was OK just like Mrs. Romney was OK and her speech was OK.

A FLOTUS speech isn’t going to make a hill of beans difference in the voting booth; so the media can stop licking her feet now. Honestly, they are embarrassing themselves the way they are falling all over her. Mrs. Cult Leader to the so-called “news” people, I presume.

What a spin you are putting on this one! She spoke to everyone.

It was an editorial decision. They decided not to air the reactions of the men who were watching ESPN on their phones.

She is a Harvard graduate that cheated on the Bar exam and got her law degree taken away from her. Yep, real brilliance there! Even the POTUS had to give up his law degree for some unknown reason and is nothing more than an instructer. Get your facts straight.

Correction: “Intelligent people, regardless of gender, race and/or sexuality not interested in what Wookie McAffirmativeaction has to say about her failure of a husband”. Piss off Mooch.

Because white men are scary and evil and yucky poo. I find it odd that any heterosexual white man with a job would cast a vote for Democrats… EVER.

….And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what today’s democratic party has become—a bunch of bean counters! I’ve never read such a load of drivel in my life—ten-gallon hats? Facial hair? I’m embarassed for the author……

That is a lie. I waited all night for MO speech.

You must be a FOX News watcher. What you are saying are pure lies.

President Obama and Lady Obama was not practicing law so they made their license expire. Santorum did the same thing. Many Lawyers who are not practicing law, instead of paying their yearly fees they let them expire
President Obama and Lady Obama were brilliant students.http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=5BKsHCR2Ma8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrEezQhG7YA&feature=related

Her status is
“Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law”, which is
far from disbarred. It also states “public record of discipline-none”
(disbarment is public discipline), and

“pending
proceedings-none” Don’t let the “not authorized to practice law”
fool you. “Voluntarily inactive” simply means she has let her license
expire, and thus, “not authorized to practice law

She fake stutters. So irritating.