When he shoots himself in the face one has to wonder what his future plans really are, because he must know by now that he has no chance of being elected.

Is he after Becks old time slot?

 ★Drudge: Time to Take Down Santorum’s Disguise
Submitted by Barracuda_Trader on Mon, 02/13/2012 – 17:31in Daily Paul Liberty Forum115 votes SOURCE– Red State: “What A Big Government Conservative Looks Like”
**Links with actual bills and dates**
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/06/what-a-big-governme…NOTE: I’m not going to personally attack Rick Santorum or his wife who opted to sue her chiropractor for $500,000. Complaint http://tinyurl.com/74qvxssAt the time Senator Santorum was stumping against his opponent for a $250,000 cap on medical malpractice suits.Whatever.It’s no secret Santorum is a serial hypocrite.”Do as I say, not as I did”But Santorum’s voting record is overwhelmingly inconsistent with the campaign propaganda that comes out of his mouth.Santorum is not remotely a conservative or a defender of freedom.He is a big government, “Show-me-the-money” LOBBYIST. Period. End of story.Santorum is also the “Lobbyists’ Best Friend”.He was rated #1 in Lobbyist Cash for 2006Open Secrets: http://tinyurl.com/73e6r3s★BREAKING: Rick Santorum Tax Returns Reveal K Street Pimp – Insider tradingBiggest compensation came health care industry and pushing for legislation that favored companies he held stock in.WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum released four years of federal income tax returns on Wednesday night…”http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/politics/local_politics… SOURCE– Red State: “What A Big Government Conservative Looks Like”
**Links with actual bills and dates**
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/06/what-a-big-governme…★Defense and Foreign PolicyVoted for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
Voted against requiring the President to certify that the CWC is effectively verifiable.
Voted against requiring the President to certify that that Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, North Korea, China, and all other countries determined to be state sponsors of terror have joined CWC prior to submitting the instrument of ratification.
Voted for the START II Treaty
Voted to allow the sale of supercomputers to China.
Voted to ban antipersonnel landmines
Voted against increasing defense spending offset by equivalent cuts in non-defense spending.
Voted to require that Federal bureaucrats get the same payraises as uniformed military.
Voted to allow food and medicine sales to state sponsors of terror and tyranical regimes such as Libya and Cuba.
Voted to limit the President’s authority to impose sanctions on nations for reasons of national security unless the sanctions were approved by a multilateral regime.
Voted against requiring Congressional authorization for military action in Bosnia.
Voted to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea
Voted to weaken alien terrorist deportation provisions. If the Court determines that the evidence must be withheld for national security reasons, the Justice Department must still provide a summary of the evidence sufficient for the alien terrorist to mount a defense against deportation.
Voted against delaying the India Nuclear until the President certified that India had agreed to suspend military-to-military exchanges with Iran.
Voted against the Conventional Trident Missile Program★NominationsVoted for Richard Paez to the 9th Curcuit (cloture)
Voted for Sonia Sotomayor, Circuit Judge
Voted for Richard Holbrooke to be Ambassador to the UN
Voted for Margaret Morrow to be District Judge
Voted twice for Marsha Berzon to the 9thg Circuit
Voted for Mary McLaughlin to be District Judge
Voted for Tim Dyk to be District Judge
Voted for James Brady to be District Judge★LaborVoted against National Right to Work Act
Voted against Real of Davis-Bacon Prevailing union wages
Voted for Alexis Herman to be Secretary of Labor
Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding
Voted for Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Voted for Job Corps funding
Voted twice in support of Fedex Unionization
Voted against allowing a waiver of Davis-Bacon in emergency situations.
Voted for minimum wage increases six times here here here here here and here
Voted to require a union representative on an IRS oversight board.
Voted to exempt IRS union representative from criminal ethics laws.
Voted against creating independent Board of Governors to investigate IRS abuses.★GunsVoted to require pawn shops to do background checks on people who pawn a gun.
Voted twice to make it illegal to sell a gun without a secure storage or safety device
Voted for a Federal ban on possession of “assault weapons” by those under 18.
Voted for Federal funding for anti-gun education programs in schools.
Voted for anti-gun juvenile justice bill.★ReformVoted for funding for the legal services corporation.
Voted twice for a Congressional payraise.
Voted to impose a uniform Federal mandate on states to force them to allow convicted rapits, arsonists, drug kingpins, and all other ex-convicts to vote in Federal elections.
Voted for the Specter “backup plan” to allow campaign finance reform to survive if portions of the bill were found unconstitutional.
Voted to mandate discounted broadcast times for politicians.
Voted for a McCain amendment to require State and local campaign committees to report all campaign contributions to the FEC and to require all campaign contributions to be reported to the FEC within 24 hours within 90 days of an election.★ImmigrationVoted against increasing the number of immigration investigators
Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens
Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.
Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors.
Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border partrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants.★TaxesVoted against a flat tax.
Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for Medicare prescription drugs
Voted to increase tobacco taxes to fund health insurance subsidies for small businesses.
Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an $8 billion increase in child healh insurance.
Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an increase in NIH funding.
Voted twice for internet taxes.
Voted to allow gas tax revenues to be used to subsidize Amtrak.
Voted to strike marriage penalty tax relief and instead provide fines on tobacco companies.
Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase.
Voted to increase taxes by $2.3 billion to pay for an Amtrak trust fund.
Voted to allow welfare to a minor who had a child out of wedlock and who resided with an adult who was on welfare within the previous two years.
Voted to increase taxes by $9.4 billion to pay for a $9.4 billion increase in student loans.
Voted to say that AMT patch is more important than capital gains and dividend relief.★WelfareVoted against food stamp reform
Voted against Medicaid reform
Voted against TANF reform
Voted to increase the Social Services Block Grant from $1 billion to $2 billion
Voted to increase the FHA loan from $170,000 to $197,000. Also opposed increasing GNMA guaranty from 6 basis points to 12.
Voted for $2 billion for low income heating assistance.★WasteSponsored An amendment to increase Amtrak funds by $550 million
Voted to use HUD funds for the Joslyn Art Museum (NE), the Stand Up for Animals project (RI) and the Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Project (WA)
Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion
Voted to increase NIH funding by $1.6 billion.
Voted to increase NIHnding by $700 million
Voted to for a $2 million earmark to renovate the Vulcan Monument (AL)
Voted for a $1 billion bailout for the steel industry
Voted against requiring that highway earmarks would come out of a state’s highway allocation
Voted to allow Market Access Program funds to go to foreign companies.
Voted to allow OPIC to increase its administrative costs by 50%
Voted against transferring $20 million from Americorps to veterans.
Voted for the $140 billion asbestos compensation bill.
Voted against requiring a uniform medical criteria to ensure asbestos claims were legitimate.
Voted to increase community development programs by $2 billion.★Spending and EntitlementsVoted to make Medicare part B premium subsidies an new entitlement.
Voted against paying off the debt ($5.6 trillion at the time) within 30 years.
Voted to give $18 billion to the IMF.
Voted to raid Social Security instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.★Health Care**Santorum’s top two campaign contributors: Blue Cross Blue Shield & High Mark. I couldn’t make this up.Voted to allow states to impose health care mandates that are stricter than proposed new Federal mandates, but not weaker.
Voted twice for Federal mental health parity mandates in health insurance.
Voted against a allow consumers the option to purchase a plan outside the parity mandate.★EducationVoted to increase Federal funding for teacher testing
Voted to increase spending for the Department of Education by $3.1 billion.
Voted against requiring courts to consider the impact of IDEA awards on a local school district. ★EnergyVoted to allow the President to designate certain sites as interim nuclear waste storage sites in the event that he determines that Yucca Mountain is not a suitable site for a permanent waste repository. Those sites are as follows: the nuclear waste site in Hanford, Washington; the Savannah River Site in South Carolina; Barnwell County, South Carolina; and the Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee. ★NEA
Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts.
Voted against a 10% cut in the budget for National Endowment for the Arts.★Bankruptcy
Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy. ★This partial list does not even include his support for No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, (Bigger than Obama care) http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=902 FIVE debt ceiling increases, funding the bridge to nowhere, refusing to redirect earmark allocations to disaster relief along the Gulf Coast post Katrina, etc ★Club for Growth today rendered an opinion on U.S. Rep. Ron Paul’s charge that Rick Santorum is a “big government, big spending individual.”Verdict: Mostly true.From Club for Growth analysis:During a particularly touchy exchange at the ABC News debate, Paul attacked Santorum for being a “big-government, big spending individual.” To back up this claim, Paul offered four substantive examples: that Santorum voted to raise the nation’s debt limit five times, that Santorum voted against “right to work” laws, that he voted for No Child Left Behind, and that he voted for the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit.
Research shows that all four substantive allegations against Santorum are true.
http://www.revolutionpac.com/2012/01/club-for-growth-confirm…★Rick Santorum: Top-tier on Most Corrupt Member of Congress list 2 years running
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/rick-s…★Patriot ActPrivacy is in 4th amendment, but Patriot Act is okQ: [to Paul] Sen. Santorum believes that the Supreme Court was wrong when it decided that a right to privacy was embedded in the Constitution.SANTORUM: No, let’s be clear. We’re talking about the 10th Amendment and the right of states to act.PAUL: I think the Fourth Amendment is very clear. It is explicit in our privacy. You can’t go into anybody’s house and look at what they have or their papers or any private things without a search warrant. This is why the Patriot Act is wrong, because you have a right of privacy by the Fourth Amendment.SANTORUM: Congressman Paul is talking about privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment, in which I agree with him, I don’t necessarily agree that the Patriot Act violates that. But I do agree that obviously we have a right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment.Source: WMUR 2012 GOP New Hampshire debate , Jan 7, 2012http://www.issues2000.org/2012/Rick_Santorum_Homeland_Securi… ★NDAA”In January 2011, Senator Santorum was asked if he would have signed the 2012 NDAA if he were President. Acknowledging that the legislation granted the President the right to arrest and detain US citizens, Senator Santorum then stated that indeed would have signed the legislation..”http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/Senate/Pennsylvani… ★Santorum: I was AGAINST bombing Iran, before I was for It! By the Way, I LOVE the Shah!http://www.dailypaul.com/213882/santorum-i-was-against-bombi...

Santorum said he would ADVOCATE it…not DO it.
When are you liberals going to stop the lies?

Sooooo…are you for or against Rick?

you’re a moron! You idiots are the only ones who lie and who are the actual devils, you dumb fascist moron!!! Also, why would you defend somebody who wants to prosecute abortion providers?!?!?! Is that in the constitution? Talk about neo-fascism and Christian Sharia!!!

I think the far gone teatard is trying to call Rick a “RINO” Some of these teatards need to go back to the institution and get a higher dosage for their meds! He’s quoting retard Erickson’s Red State blog…. Go figure!

 A difference without a distinction.

Someone,please remind this moron he’s running for POTUS…

Or not…after all,he’s pretty damn hilarious if you ask me.

You are for Paul obviously but you are not very clear in your comments.  They are all over the place.  I think you are OVER dramatizing and mis-interpreting what Santorum said BECAUSE YOU ARE FOR PAUL but you are not making a point, can you clarify?  And by the way, I am an independent and have to yet make a decision as to who I will vote for.  All I know is that the Catholic Church is endorsing Santorum and they have a BIG following. 

What is YOUR IQ that you speak in such a manner? 

Santorum “don’t know nothing about birthing babies” to quote Prissy in Gone With The Wind — When he’s able to get pregnant and have children then he will have a right to criticize the abortion issue.  These male politicians who run around ranting an raving on the abortion issue need to give it a rest.  Women who decide to have an abortion will find a way to do so with or without a doctor’s help.  It’s a decision women have been making dating back, I’m sure since the beginning of time.

Only Devils would ask someone else to endorse the selfish killing of their own offspring.
You are just projecting your guilt on others…Lambchop.
It’s not in the Constitution but the Declaration of Independence guarantees all to LIFE, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.
You and your ilk snuff out that life.
Abortion Doctors are butchers with stethoscopes.
Ever heard of the Hippocratic Oath?
“Never do harm”
Deal with your own guilt…I am free of it.
BTW…It is Sharia that kills babies and sexually mutilates women…..get educated.

I am fully aware of your mental limitations…but here goes:
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
 

This raises a more critical question: what should become of the doctor who, with the blessing of the Santorums, administered life-saving drugs to Karen Santorum that caused the death of their child Gabriel.

To make up for having the right to choose, the Santorum’s slept with their dead baby overnight, and brought it home to their children.

The Santorum’s had an abortion. No don’t you do the same.

Karen Santorum ended her pregnancy, with her husband’s blessing, to save her life. Karen Santorum had an abortion.

uh…Santorum is running for PRESIDENT, of the COUNTRY, not altar boy. ADVOCATING for criminal charges against abortion providers when you are PRESIDENT means introducing a bill to become a LAW, which gets ENFORCED against everyone else. Except his wife.

If this bigot cared anything about human life, he would advocate for greater sex education for teens, to PREVENT unwanted pregnancies. Do you really want a President who no longer has sex with his wife, and wants to tell everyone else to do the same? You want THAT man to have his finger on a nuclear bomb?

Rick Santorum keeps melding religion into his speeches. His religion is not everyone religion here in America. Politicians should stay away from religious overtones and controversies, and those who deliberately try to infuse their religion onto others, is stepping way out-of-bounds. Santorum has no idea of what president Obama says or does in any realm, but merely spewing his own distorted views to drag down the president’s aura and prestige. Santorum has no idea at all of how the president thinks. Questioning president Obama’s Christian values is not for Santorum or anyone else’s business. President Obama’s christian values would do nothing to generate jobs in America, just as the current 112th Congress has done to date. Santorum is a politician trying to mix in religious values into our political realm, rather than question the 112th(current) Congress on their inability to generate jobs as they promised in 2010. Questioning Romney’s Olympic leadership in retrospect does nothing to help generate the jobs the TEA party promised back in 2010. Any right-winged politician questioning another’s Christian values is stepping way outside the boundaries of their political realm. America was not started as a bible thumping country and these extremist are taking their church into the depths of politicizing issues. America has numerous religions and no one should question another’s religious background, just because he/she are of another religion. The words state: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, not TEA party-ers are the one to run the country, or women are second class citizens, as they won the right to vote and choose their own leadership. Courting the TEA party separates those who would discuss and compromise from confrontational-ist with narrow-minded, narcissistic positions.

And yet here’s an interview with Santorum where he says the woman should not be charged with anything.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2BrZm7EEpk

If the GOP ends up with this guy, congratulations to President Obama on a disastrous 2ND term.

That mean old Santorum wants to stop killing babies, who does he think he is? 

I am certain that he advocates sex-ed for teens but not by liberal pervs in public schools.

He isn’t telling anyone what to do…but he, like all Presidents, would attempt to introduce legislation which would make certain actions illegal.
That’s how it works. It is Congress that holds the balances in check.
The rest of your post is just too ridiculous to comment on.

 The “Catholic Church” is more than just bishops, who cannot speaks for the laity.  And despite what the old right-wing Protestants think, Catholics do not vote the way the priests tell them (and never have).  Very few of our votes have been swayed by this debate, since we ignore the anitiquated ban on contraception we are not going to take the view that no co-pay on contraception is an attack on our religious freedom. So if you really believe that Catholics are going to vote for Santorum over this you are profoundly ignorant and delusional.

Now fundamentalists burning Catholic convents and churches, that was an infringement on our 1st Amendment rights.

Women have the right to birth control and anyone who states they do not is someone who should not be in a position of power over anyone in the country, most especially women.  I fought for women’s rights in the sixties and seventies, and we sure don’t need to go backwards now.  Putting an aspirin between your legs might sound like a joke to some people, but when someone says this, they are not joking.  We have a right to freedom of choice.  I’m afraid when I hear something said like this.  Let’s not go backwards by choosing a President who truly does not believe in equality and freedom for all.

It will be a cold day in hell before the likes of Sarah Palin who
consider shooting wolves from a helicopter moral because it is good for a
state’s sport hunting industry, tell me that there is something immoral
about using the day-after-pill or having an abortion.

He’s someone who wants the government making medical decisions for its citizens. I guess he’s a socialist.

Is he going to charge the ex-boyfriend of his wife who was an active abortionist when his wife had an affair with this man?

Ron Paul is the only candidate out there on both sides that supports the protection of all freedoms and not just the ones he happens to like. All other candidates and all presidents of past and probably future only support the protection of freedoms that they like at the time. What people don’t seem to understand is that if you try and control someone’s freedoms then eventually the ones you hold dear will be controlled as well. Really everyone gets what they deserve since they’re unwilling to support the protection of all freedoms.

If someone says what he said, they are typically asked to see a therapist. There are the ones who are religious and should be respected and then there are fanatics who should be feared.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/santorum-satan-systematically-destroying-america 

Ok…Let me play along…

Advocate it…So as a President his opinion is respected Congress would pass such a legislation and then he would….Veto it?  I don’t think so.

Please look into your heart and tell me why are you defending someone who would force an 11 year old who is raped to bear a child?

And a war on Iran without provocation would do what to Iranian women and babies?

Sarah palin?
Where the hell did THAT come from?
You libs are all over the place.
LOL!!!

WTF???
Iran???
 

 139-144 when it was tested  in the 70s

 spoken as a true patriot who thinks for herself and the common good.

 zealots should be feared and fanatics should be put down. and generally zealots become fanatics, but i believe that Santorum is a frustrated sociopath who has yet to act conclusively in that way, he may be some what inclined to a messianic complex also.

I only feel this way due to the reports that he is inflexible and incapable of true compromise and has no tolerance for those who exhibit qualities he does not himself possess.

But hey i am just expressing my belief and opinion, I could be wrong……..maybe.

Or the Doctor who aborted her baby?

What about the Doctor who aborted Rick’s child?  Will he advocate his arrest?

Killing children and genital mutation is in the OT also my friend. Even meek and mild Jesus advocated killing children in the NT.

Don’t forget he wants to stop contraceptive use and sex for pleasure. But on the up side he wants to kill Iranian women and children.  He giveth and taketh away.

the church is endorsing? and this is common knowledge? is this from the bishop of Rome? Has the devils advocate examined him and has he expressed confidence he is not an agent of/for or the facilitator of/for or Him? an endorsement would be quite a departure from the accepted forms of conduct in these worldly matters, or is this something of the American church considering the latitude given to the princes of the church in these matters in areas of their responsibility.

But then again to me this is of no consequence as i am the master of mine own destiny and make mine own allowances and accommodations with the three.

For me the path of the common good decides and that is President Obama, he satisfies my needs in worldly matters, for others it is and always has been a matter of conscious in the choosing.

Think for yourself and reason it out as to what is best for you and yours.

Who thinks to do the greatest common good for yourself and others?

 well said and to the conservatives and the right wingers:vox po.pu.li vox dei and should  they not like it tu.e.bor or in more appropriate terms I stand with the UNION and the rule of law not men.

 priest king of the Americas with a divine right to rule is more like it

 LATIN? well it has been a while: the voice of the people is the voice of god? and defend yourself?

and I agree with second part whole heartedly.

 That’s the spirit and it is true he and they have no right to make such decisions.

 ”First do no harm” and it is a commandment to healers not to anyone else and “God commanded Abraham to kill his first born” and “you shall sacrifice your daughter on the alter on a hill to atone to god” the first was a test of faith and obedience the second is now rejected by most paths of the judo-christian-Islamic faiths which share the OT There truly is nothing in the bible about abortion those who claim there is are doing nothing more than creating an interpretation of justification for a decision they have made, yes there is a lot of that as articles of faith but that does not make it right or godly it is an artificial creation by those of faith, and you should get educated because the articles of confederation the bridge to the constitution, linked the declaration to the constitution as a document of founding ideals to shape an understanding of where the Constitution draws its original inspirations and guidance from, the federalist papers are nothing more than arguments of interpretation as to what the constitution may or may not mean in the times of the founding and are not binding in any way just a reference guide for those times WE THE PEOPLE are the first and only legitimate power to decide what it means and we have a system for establishing what it means in the context of the times in which we live that is why the meanings of words are so important and why we give SOME deference to original intent but only SOME deference to those past conditions you sick ignorant freak, you would order all things to be as you wish with no regard of others to do the same, that is Fascist not socialist. AGAIN GET EDUCATED and dont play petty games with i didn’t say that you have a long history of wanting to impose your will and what you want on others, you disparage and demean others and other beliefs. 

 AGAINST.

you got the first one pretty much spot on the second is ‘I will defend’, together they usually mean “when the people have spoken it is decided and that must be defended” one of them the latter is in the capital and the other is on the seal of Michigan *something republicans do not respect* and both are on a federal courthouse, my American government courses stuck. we got a lot of Latin in this countries structure.

how about thinking less as a nation and start acknowledging there is other life out there that is our friends…:)

but not exactly. in this democracy we were envisioned to at least find some common ground and unite – like basic dignity and freedom. what the hell went wrong? this is no democracy and it seems far less stable / happy / insert your desired state her = than any other arrangement demonized. why can’t we all take a deep breath and relax?
out of control and i do not like to see us ilke this – we are better

 Santorum thinks he is right — and persecuted for telling inconvenient truths. With this presupposition, he “knows” the populace will come around to his views when push comes to shove. So he is willing to begin the pushing. He wants Christian shariah n America.

 Ned, do you even know Ron Paul’s position on abortion?

Go for it! I nominate you as our spokesperson, Emily. Let us know when the aliens tell us something heretofore unknown, please ;-)

messianic complex..LOL!

Why? Iranian women and children are inferior to American Christians?  They are spawn of Satan, right?

How dare his scum bag  play Jackie Gleason theme!  He isn’t fit to clean Jackie’s toilet.
 

you can have a positon without a position. i welcome coherent thogth ,. romney is as manufactures as ,kim mardashian- or so i hear, 
love newt. 

voice of the people is represented by our elected leadership in decisions varying greaty with a complexity and nuance far greater and perhaps simpler than is portrayed in the media. It is a team effort operation as best they can . To choose this path attracts the  same cast of characters as any other – never mind. it is is not power vanity or greed – i mow see clear that if you can you must contribute to the best of you ability.
)<<< i really can;'t find any other reason why they'd take the pay cut :) 

(first class! game changer@facebook-100000305045290:disqus !)

How does one criminally charge someone with a crime for performing a service that the SCOTUS has deemed to be legal?  
Because in Santorum’s world, Biblical law supersedes the U.S. Constitution.  Perhaps the abortion doctors should be stoned as well …?

His belief that life begins at conception is fundamentally irreconcilable with his support for criminal charges against the abortion provider but not the mother.  What if the mother uses a coat hanger, or RU 486?  Is there anything more outrageous than someone imposing their sloppy, inconsistent, and detrimental beliefs on other people.

Rick, what are you going to charge the doctors with?? Abortion is legal in this country you f*cking idiot!!

How could criminal charges be brought against a doctor that is doing a procedure that is legal?  Rick Santorum is delusional.  He is no better than the dictator we have in office now. 

So the choice for the GOP is this extreme religious fanatic or the empty suit robot Romney. They are so screwed.

I too believe life begins at the moment of conception and that what doctors are doing is wrong.  However, you can’t run for President of the US and espouse those beliefs publicly because you see what you get.   If you are a Republican please reconsider Romney – Santorum is a mess!

I like Newt.
Romney is Obama cast in caucasian

 Would you rather I force her to butcher her baby?
Look into your own heart.

Memo to Santorum (may I call you dipS**T?)  Abortion is legal.  Get off the cross, we need the wood as the saying goes.  Keep your big mouth out of women’s issues. I have heard it said that he believes:  ”life begins at ERECTION.”   This is a woman’s issue and until he gets pregnant, has a period, etc., his opinions are worth NOTHING.

Memo:  Keep out of my womb and I’ll keep out of your church.  No, I am not of child-bearing age, but if I were, I’d not let ANYONE tell me what I can and cannot do — especially if is LEGAL!

Yes, the above is total fact:  She dated a Pittsburgh doctor who was an abortionist (he delivered  her when she was born).  It was a lengthy relationship.  She could have changed her mind, yes, BUT why is this fact NEVER EVEN brought up and seems to be “kept under wraps.”  GOOGLE it and see for yourself.

My heart is clean.  According to you, you would destroy the life of the girl to satify your procreation views.  I guess there is no difference between you and Santorum.  No point discussing.

Perhaps life begins at ERECTION.  How can you decide (Santorum) what a woman should do who has been raped or pregnant with a child of incest?  You would have that woman pregnant for 9 months and deliver a baby she does not want!
He is brainless and has no business talking about women’s choices.

Yes.  Another skeleton (see above).

My fondest hope is that someday (ah, when?) will a candidate’s religious beliefs be totally kept out of the campaign — in other countries it is not mentioned.

Anyone here check out the VERY INVASIVE process that is being considered in Virginia?  There is a probe put into a woman’s body (pregnant) that tests for the fetal heartbeat.  It is a terrible looking device and must be painful.  AND WHY?

An abortion “done early”  has no appearance of a child.  Look up anatomy.  The “tissue” could not live on its own outside the womb.

As the old “engineering slogan goes:”  PROTECTION BEFORE ERECTION.  

I really don’t believe that Santorum wants to be President, he just using this opportunity for free advertisement for a faith healing church he wants to get started,  ”The Church of the Sexually Deviant”.  

He should be locked up  -  and purged of/from his evil sins!

Nobody is going to ban birth control you fool.  Open your ears. 

What’s he going to charge them with?  Practicing a LEGAL procedure? 

 He’s a hypocrite. His own wife aborted a late term fetus.  Personally, I think you would have to be brain damaged to even consider voting for Mr. Frothy.

 ALL of your posts are ridiculous.

 Heck, yeah. There’s no shame in abortion. Sometimes it’s the smartest thing to do, and guess what, it’s not your decision to make.  You can squawk all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that abortion is legal, as it ought to be.

 That guy (I am 99% sure it’s a male) is an idiot.

 I think it’s just a way to shame and punish women for having a healthy sex life.

 He only hates abortion when anyone else has one. It was fine for his wife to have a late-term abortion because, well, they are so special!

Why would you advocate for something that was determined to be unconstitutional 4 decades ago? 

They aren’t offspring until they are born, doofus.  

I know a bunch of catholics who use birth control and think Santorum is a nut case and they usually vote GOP but are not at all sure what they are going to do this year since all the candidates are nuts.  Not worried about that BIG following. 

Ron Paul wants states to have the right to outlaw abortion and he personally things it should be illegal.  He wants Roe v Wade overturned.  I know that you have taken him on like a guru, but you really ought to start actually listening to what he says instead of just hearing what you want to hear. Oh, and he’s also a racist.  

Let’s face it.  Santorum is so mentally anguished over the fact that his wife lived with a doctor who performed abortions for 6 years.  She was a nurse and then went to law school where she met Santorum.  Just google the name “Tom Allen Santorum” and it will tell you about the relationship and show pictures of her picture with the good doctor in Pittsburgh.

I know he’s against abortion and believes that the unborn life should be defended at the state level. Why do you ask?

Where is all this coming from? Are you reading something in about abortion that I didn’t say in regards to Ron Paul. Quit making assumptions. My statement suggested that once you take away some freedoms then eventually you’ll end up with all freedoms taken away, even the ones you want to protect.

That’s what he has said.  In fact, he said even a raped 12-year old should not have to go through the pain of having an abortion, but should be made to go through 9 months of pregnancy with a baby from the result of the rape.  Go figure.  This guy is insane.

 I ask because you’re putting Paul forward as one to protect freedoms within the context of the state prohibiting abortions — the state intruding into the doctor’s office. Paul supports the
Sanctity of Life Act. Under Paul’s vision, the states would be free — free to be the tyrants sticking their noses into women’s medical issues.

Paul does stand for a lot of freedom, but he is also willing to let states impose their religious views on its residents.

Its not his place to say what a Woman can and cannot do with her body. If she does not want the baby then that is her choice if she gets an abortion or not, not his. This is not about religion, it is about a females rights to have complete control over her body and her choices and they should not be stolen by some ignorant politician. He will NEVER be put into the situation of a woman who wants to have an abortion and neither will any other male. This is a female issue and should be decided by females themselves, not males.

If he wants to verbally express his religious beliefs then fine with me, But he should not push them upon other people that do not share the same beliefs. Religion should be kept out of politics.

An early abortion is practically painless.  NO CHILD OF RAPE should have to go through a pregnancy and childbirth.  I had one child  – 50 hours of labor — 3 months of recovery.  No, I did not want an abortion, but no child should go through this!  Lynch him.  He is a few cards short of a full deck, as the saying goes.

56Million abortions since Roe vs. Wade.  You are OK with this?

Little Ricky is a tool. last time I checked, abortion is LEGAL in this country.

 Denise_in_georgia is right. Your question to her didn’t even make
sense.

“Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them than your
ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands.
Remember all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and
attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion,
and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or
representation.”
- Abigail Adams

It is like having an appendectomy - in fact a lot less painful.  Who could even think of denying a rape victim the access to the morning after pill?  You were right- someone with a few cards short of a full deck.

You can call them whatever you wish, but they are a glob of cells, completely unable to survive outside the woman’s uterus.  If Santorum wants to see if he can carry the glob of cells in his uterus, he is welcome to a transplant.

As someone previously said, some people are a few cards short of a full deck.  Alivestillkickin is one of those.  Don’t criticize others until you have walked in their shoes.

Let me make this clear to all those people who think that abortion shouldn’t be legal.
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE ABORTIONS – legal or illegal.  In fact, the new Virginia law is going to just push abortions to the adjoining states and underground.

There are many students in healthcare – ie. doctors in pre-med, who can very easily begin their own illegal procedures.  Procedures they believe in and will pay their school costs.

Back in the 60′s, that is who did the abortions for the most part.  They believed in what they were doing, they knew what they were doing and they earned tax free money to get the help the women needed.

 http://lnk.co/IHOTL

Someone forgot to tell Rick that abortions are LEGAL.  If you don’t like it try to change it but until you do it is the sworn responsibility of the President to support what is Constitutional.  I am not surprised of the banality that erupts from this mans mouth.

You are speaking on the assumption that life begans at conception. That’s not a fact,and I’m ready to accept it as one.

I accept!

 Until birth control is more readily available and sex ed is more comprehensive, expect that number to keep going up.